23 thoughts on “Update Notes: Thursday, January 10, 2013

  1. There is no other adorn that I can think of that could possibly be more worthless to the one wearing it and whatever group is unlucky enough to have that person join them. It is NEVER the best choice, it is never the second best, third best it really shouldn’t even be an option.

  2. i also dont understand why ammos conservation.
    It’s the best (must have) adornment for ranger and almost useless for everyone else. So why remove this one from table ? i dont get it.

    Just set Ammos conservation to Ranger only and problem solved.

    Even some bard could want it… (i disagree on that)

    I saw lot of ranger melee and dirge range. Something go wrong and remove this adornment is in line with this wrong things.

    Or give endless quiver to ranger (the AA from EQ1 ;))

    I disagree than some class are too much dependent from craft, … ranger is the only one. Even assassin can kill without poison, but a ranger without arrow, it’s just a very very bad assassin 😉

    ENDLESS QUIVER !

  3. I agree with Madcat… As a ranger using Dragon Bone Arrows the maligonian horns them self cost over 45pp so having X% ammo conservation for a ranger is OK.. but yeah other classes surely don’t really need it as much.. Endless Quiver would have fixed the issue.. Ranger is the only class that it costs money to kill a mob.. Sure they can melee but the true power is ranged.. And now that maligonian horns don’t drop in the new CoE zones its even worse.. so yeah Rangers could use rhenium arrows but isn’t +532 slashing +5 meters +10% Hit better than +177 crushing +5 meters +10% Hit?

  4. If you were a ranger using ammo conservation after CoE, you were a ranger that wasn’t really paying attention to how to DPS.

    With no conservation, I was only using 2-3 stacks of dragon bones / raid.

    However, if you used regular arrows and put CB adorns where you had conservation, you’d do more damage than using DB arrows with ammo conservation.

  5. I burn so few arrows now I don’t mind paying the ridicules prices people charge for horns. As a ranger before CoE I would almost go through an entire quiver of arrows if not more in one raid night. Now, I don’t think I’ve restocked since CoE has released. So that is probably why they are removing them.

  6. As a Ranger main, after the update to conservation and crafting that lowered both price and use, when I first saw the ammo conservation adorns I was thinking, “Really?”
    I was a person who constantly disliked how much it cost me to raid and play with arrow costs, but instead of fixing it moderately they WAY overdid it. So much so I actually thought it was bugged to be even slower then the mechanics called for. Not that I am complaining about that.
    To actually use an ammo consumption instead of CB or haste seems like a waste even if I am using dragon bone on my raids.
    To me I thought the fix itself was so overdone they might as well have made ammo free.

    1. I am using so little ammo on my Ranger despite AE Auto, Flurry, and MA, I think I have restocked arrows only once since Chains of Eternity. Contrast this to before the expansion where I had to refill my quiver (I think it’s 24 slots) once a week.

    1. I bet momo is still selling the lesser version of these runes too. Maybe with some luck, all these newer adornments will be available for sale some time soon.

      Nope that got shot down. Article incoming.

  7. @Zerigo
    That would be nice, as the current whack-a-mole system of getting them, while an interesting method taken solely on its own merits, as the sole method of acquiring the new adorns is pretty bad. Paired with another more straightforward (if more expensive somehow) system it would be quite good though.

Leave a Reply