23 thoughts on “First Takes: ‘Chains of Eternity’ Expac, PlayerStudio

  1. +1

    I believe this is one of the best write-ups/editorials Feldon’s given us to date. I’m also excited to check out PlayerStudio … and you really can’t go wrong with a new expansion. Well. Hopefully not, anyway. 😉

  2. I enjoy public quests.. now if only they weren’t time based. They need to be up all the time any time in various stages.. like in DCUO or Warhammer. They’re always available in various stages but with like a 1hour or 2hour cycle time. They are drop in drop out and they do or do not scale depending on the event.

    I do like eq2’s public quests and I think they were relatively popular in DoV, mostly because they were in the armor progression line, but if they put something to make people come back to them aside from armor progression they’d probably stay more popular. I.e. emerald halls has the seeds that people still go get for certain things. Echos was several expansions again.

    Tradeskill materials or those rare items are prime examples of exclusive drops that make people revisit and replay content years after its been obsolete.

    Lastly, I too have hope for dungeon maker and player studio.. the contest proved there are amazingly, creative players out there.

  3. IMHO they shouldn’t have announced the Player Studio until everything was in place for ALL players to use it, and by that I mean Europeans too. We know it is ‘complicated for legal and tax reasons’, but SOE bigging it up and then adding, ‘oh and we’re working on it for Euros’ at a time when us European customers have an all time low morale thanks to the PSS1 debarcle it is something of a smack in the face with a wet fish. They could have held off the annoucement, or stressed that when it launches it will be available for ALL, rather than adding Euros as an after thought. Maybe I am over sensitive, but I am not alone in feeling like this – us Euro customers are utterly sick of being second-class and after-thoughts to SOE.

    I also wonder if the delays to EQ2’s transition to PSS1 is more to do with timing it around the expansion for promo and player retention reasons than it is to do with any concerns over PSS1’s capabilities.

    Yours,
    An utterly fed up European SOE customer

  4. Nice to see some positive commentary out of you, oh Bitter One.

    At first I was worried that the bar would be too high for most players to get in on user-made content, but after thinking about it more I guess this will ensure a smaller stream of stuff for SOE to check (and hopefully higher quality, too).

    And I can’t wait for 9 more instances. I’m hoping for a solid heroic progression that has a good long run before requiring heroic people to have raid gear to finish it (cough Drunder cough).

  5. You guys are fooling yourself if you think you will be able to create something truly ground up with 3DSM and be able to get it added into the game. Just taking ques off the crappy DM, I’ed say it will be a Lego type thing. Where you’ll be able to use SOE provided templates/macros in software like 3DSM but that is about it.

  6. Landiin,

    You will be able to CREATE house items from scratch. Full stop.

    Look at the websites linked in the PlayerStudio article. They link you to 3rd party 3D modeling software, texturing/illustration software, etc. It’s nothing like what you are describing.

    House items and cloaks are the two things you’ll be able to do at first, with more to come.

  7. I have the same feeling Landiin, I have the feeling that there will be small print limiting the number of polygons/triangles/vertices etc to such a small number that items created will look like garbage.

    I would also have reservations about submitting work to them for review with certain policies they have in place. These policies are of course standardfrom all companies.

    http://www.soe.com/termsofservice.vm?locale=en_US

    C. RIGHTS IN USER CONTENT

    Any and all User Content submitted (e.g., by uploading or transmitting) to SOE shall be deemed, and shall remain, the property of SOE and/or its Third Party Providers from the moment of uploading or transmission. Accordingly, SOE shall exclusively own all now known or hereafter existing copyrights and all other intellectual property rights to all User Content of every kind and nature, in perpetuity, throughout the universe and you hereby assign to SOE as a present assignment of future rights all such intellectual property rights to the extent owned by you. To the extent any of the User Content is not assignable, by submitting User Content to an SOE Communication Feature, you agree that SOE and/or its Third Party Providers shall be irrevocably entitled to, throughout the universe and in perpetuity, use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, broadcast, license, perform, post, sell, translate, create derivative works from and distribute any User Content for any purpose whatsoever, commercial or otherwise, in any medium now known or hereafter devised, without compensation or credit to the provider of the User Content, including sublicensing any third party to do any of the foregoing. To the extent permitted by applicable laws, you also give up any claim that any use by SOE and/or its Third Party Providers of any User Content violates any of your rights, including but not limited to moral rights, privacy rights, rights to publicity, proprietary or other rights, and/or rights to credit for the material or ideas set forth therein.

    So unless there is a specific exclusion of this policy for anything submitted for review under the player studio well I’ll just remind everyone of the thread where they were asking what kind of items we wanted to see in game thread where very early on it was asked (and of course ignored, because that was the obvious intent and purpose of the thread to begin with) are these for crafter or for the SC shop… Then soon ideas from that thread started apppearing where? Hint: the answer was NOT in any recipe books fro crafters.

    So SOE doesn’t like your item for whatever reason and rejects it but then goes and makes some minor changes to it and it goes into the shop and you are SOL.

    Wouldn’t even bother asking about this specific policy on the forum it would just be ignored or moderated for discussing legal policies etc.

  8. I saw the producer letter today. I just gotta say, is this expansion that big announcement? There has to be more… Ground Breaking shift? I don’t see one. It may be because I been playing MMOs for 15 years and became a bit callus to what is or isn’t innovative, but I just see another expansion with the same old stuff promised. Sure we got a player studio coming, but I have one already. it’s called Second Life. And I don’t have game devs taking a cut of my earnings or restricting what I can upload there. Unless its copyrighted, trademarked, patented by someone else.

  9. First I said I was taking my que from DM. I never said it was how it was going to be, it was just an assumption. I was more referring to armor, pets, mounts etc but yea I didn’t really make that clear.

    I’ve been doing UI mods for eq2 long enough to know the kind of restrictions they like to keep on the community moding in-game objects to know they’ll never give free reins.

  10. The expansion looks decent, not too many details to judge by so far. How many prestige points? One every 20% as before? I really like the idea of organic adornments, will have to wait and see how they are implemented. The nine instanced zones is kinda vague, is it nine distinct zones, or a solo/heroic/raid version of three?

    Wasn’t there supposed to be a big announcement scheduled for today (Friday) as well? I though SJ tweeted that.

  11. Hmmm doing this could be make for a good portfolio depending how good your work is.

    I make stuff from time to time in Source SDK for tf2, so this sounds like it has potential, but from SoE, i’m holding my breath for the moment.

  12. The big Friday announcement was Alpha Squad for Planetside 2…pay $40 get 4000 SC, instant beta access and the F2P equivalent of a pre-order bonus (XP boni, free unlocks, unique textures).

  13. I honestly wouldn’t be surprised Trueflight. SoE clings on to one gimmick idea, trashes it, then moves on to the next. They have no solid leadership and it seems Holly is just the lamb sent out to the wolves so SJ doesn’t get the heat for being a terrible leader. Then again, it’s been this way years before SJ anyways *looks at Smedley*

  14. imo 9 new zones means ? solo zones, 9 heroic zones, and atleast 3 raid zones recycling the heroic zone.
    its unrealistically pessimistic to think the new 9 will be 3 solo, 3 heroic, and 3 raid.

    the pattern is established. TSO, 5 overland zones with 3 instances each (plus bonus varsoon and zua), 1 raid zone per overland. SF 2 overland zones, 4 sets of 3 instances each, 4 raid zones. DoV part 1. 4 sets of 3 instances. 1 raid zone per set. since then weve had piecemeal. drunder with a set of 3, then skyshrine with a set of 3 plus bonus ud.

    its illogical to assume it will be 3 solo, 3 heroic, and 3 raid, totaling 9.

    that level of pessimism is irrational. the only time sets of “3 only” are added is without purchase. drunder and skyshrine were both free for those of us who already bought velious. that brings velious to a total of 6 sets of 3 instances, with bonus ud, plus tofsx2 and vuulx2.

  15. that level of pessimism is rational, unless you havnt played EQ2 since long (very). There s reason, LOT of reason to be pessimism. It’s cald be reaslit.
    So many bugs, broken thing, itemization just this word say like 25% of the thing.

    It’s simple they dont work to improve the game anymore at all. Just some fluffy things… and not that much.

    And for be realist, i bet on the 9 zone, if there is 3… we ll have at last one who ll be bugged at hell, totaly unbalanced. (easy bet :P)

    They fall so low, now they have to prove they are able to do it, we cant beleve it until we ll see it.

  16. Well according to SOE’s RIGHTS IN USER CONTENT, it may be fun for players to create content, but I’ll be dammed if I’m going to create anything that is then owned by SOE. What a scam – a good way for SOE to employ slave labor.

Leave a Reply