18 thoughts on “Live: EQ2 Mechanics and Class Balance Panel

  1. Is that it on Ranger issues? Getting us evened up with assassins on DPS does not make us equally desirable in view of the disparity on Utility. We will still have nothing to recommend us in the groups we need to DPS. Making Hawk work in a raid environment? Extensions of FA?

  2. Oh I see Feldon! Crabbok asks a quesition and you mention him by name. *I* ask and I’m just another random guy. T_T My pride has been destroyed.

    I kid, I kid! Great job on this. We cant make out the questions so you’re a life saver!

  3. Well it’s not like he would recognize you Ferrel. It’s not like he knows you or has had dinner with you or anything like tha…. er…. wait…. Nevermind…. Kidding, kidding. 🙂 Keep up the awesome work Feldon!

  4. “We’ll look into it” God, I feel bad for the people who paid to go see these people blow smoke up their ass. If you can’t provide in depth interaction then don’t hold a damn conference.

  5. Sure would have liked to hear some actual details on Ranger fixes instead of “we’ll look into it”. I can’t say I expected anything more but still disappointing. I guess the potential for getting flurry on ranged is something but that would be a very minor upgrade by itself.

  6. meh wish I could go to these things, crit bonus halved for wards never gets asked. 100 crit bonus from gear/buffs in raid on a cleric/druid becomes 50 crit bonus for a shammy because 7years ago someone wanted to make a 0.3 into a 0.15 crit bonus modifier for wards and wrote ward crit bonus divided by 2 instead of ward crit bonus minus 0.15

  7. The Ranger fixes aren’t so much Ranger fixes as they are going to look at bow mechanics and I believe give things like flurry and ae auto to bows before looking directly at rangers.

    In one of the panels they also mentioned (no specifics) improvements to bows and two-handers.

Leave a Reply