8 thoughts on “Dislodging Adornments on a Budget

  1. I know, I was trying to give them the benefit of the doubt … Feldon suggested “An eternal optimist might say that leaving it up to players to decide whether to destroy the item to salvage the adornment is part of a longer term strategy to bring choice and hard decisions back to EQ2 itemization after years of streamlining,” so my comment was directed at his eternal optimism. Which is, even if that WAS a strategy, it’s silly sauce.

    The fact is, itemization is probably so messed up at this point all they can do is give us cheap unadorners and threaten “the item will be destroyed!” to give it some appearance of value.

    “Working as intended” for itemization at this point strains the boundaries of credibility.

  2. I’d send Sony a check if they banned the use of the phrase “working as intended.”

    I swear to god every time I hear them say that I picture them giving me the finger and it pisses me off.

  3. WOW what has SOE done to the player made dislodgers. The Basic and advanced trichromatic ones use to take rares to make and now only require common harvests. I have over 100 made dislodgers that needed rares to make and close too 200 banyan roots in my bags that I bought for about 8-9 plat each. The already made ones are atleast 800 plat lost to me and I expect the banyan root market to drop in price as well. From what I can see is that the advance trichrom only takes twice the common harvest as the basic tri does which seems to make the basic one useless.

  4. 250 plat nothing new i can see sony doesn’t even play the game . to understand it’s cost you need to be active within the game . 250 was cheap before but not now .150 – 125 is more like it sony . the chump change we get now will maybe cover that .

Leave a Reply