20 thoughts on “Server Merges Begin 16 November 2010

  1. I don’t agree with the sixty day priority however. It’s a cheap cash grab, I’m not activating my accounts to preserve names I’ve had for 6/7 years, that’s my call. But what about the guy/gal out on tour serving their country, or someone out working somewhere and they can’t be here in time to log in??? They are screwed out of their names for that?

  2. I think this name priority is a lot more fair than the previous methods. If you’re not playing a character anymore, and someone else is, they should take priority.

    This keeps things from happening like someone who’s played 100+ days on a level 90 character created in 2005 who’s still actively playing it from losing their name to a level 10 character created in 2004.

    This time though, in the same example above, if that level 90 character hasn’t played in sixty days but the level 10 character just came back and is playing again, the level 10 gets priority. That’s kinda hosed for the level 90 character, agreed. But if you’re not playing, it’s not really fair to rename the active character to retain the name of a character who hasn’t logged in in sixty days and for all we know many never log in again.

    I see your point about people on tour out of the country who are unable to log in to make sure their character has been active in the last 60 days to save the name. However, I think that’s a very small number of people under those circumstances who will be impacted. I’ve seen with my own two eyes soldiers playing online games like EQ2 in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Qatar, Korea, Germany, England, and Italy. There are remote FOBs where people are stationed who are unable to do so, but in a lot of places where people are stationed, things like EQ2 are available. Even those who are unable to play from the place they are stationed, the name would have to conflict in order for them to lose it. Still kinda blows that they’d lose their name but I think overall, this method is more fair.

  3. Well, as a 5 year Vox player who hasn’t used LiveGamer even once, we complained about the low server population many times. We were demanding a merge since 1.5 years and SOE didn’t give us that opportunity.
    They still talking about “contractural obligations” which means they didn’t take our comments into account. They could easily check if we used LG or not and could give non-LG players a chance to merge. Have I (we) asked too much as 6.5 year players?
    My last hope is gone, so I’m gonna sadly quit.

  4. Good points Dethdlr, i still feel 2 months is too short though. Players can take longer refresh breaks than 2 months sometimes. They may have played since launch, now on a good healthy break, may miss the email and could loose their name to level 5 players who was only trying out the game for a month and then quit.

    6 months minimum would be fair, a year would be decent of them.

  5. I doubt there are many/any long-standing character names that will have this problem, unless of course you have a name taken from a popular character, event or process.
    Most the changes will come with alts and/or trial/temporary players, most of which will probably have less than 7 days played on that specific character. Checked my own main and alts’ names and the closest contention was with my main (common name) who had 6+ others of the same name worldwide but was the only level 90, let alone taking time played into account. of my alts, only 2 had similar names elsewhere and even as an alt level and as such time-played was far higher than the competition.

  6. I am very happy about this except 1 thing

    1 of my characters I renamed in March to a new name that wasn’t used on my server Najena. Using the 2500SC rename potion.

    Now I am going to lose the name I paid money for because the server Najena is merging to has the only other level 90 of that name – and he has /played 30 days more than me.

    I don’t think its right to allow paid for name changes then take it away without some sort of compensation. I know you get a free name pick but thats not the point when you pay to get a certain name. I’d be happy if the SC spent on name changes that get undone on transfer got refunded.

  7. As a player from Butcherblock I as well, welcome the folks from Kithicor!

    There looks to be a few solid raiding guilds, and I would to finally have some real competition.

    Once you have transfered over and experience all of our lag and interact with some of our players. You will probably hear the sarcastic saying “Welcome to Butcherblock”!

  8. @dubritski: SmokeJumper posted this:

    The hardware upgrade is not forthcoming immediately. However, when we merge the worlds, we are adding *all* of the machines from both worlds merged into that single world’s available systems. This greatly reduces the load on any specific CPU and should do good things. We’ll know more soon after doing the first test of this concept.

    They’ve given a few details here and there about why this should help. Basically, persistant zones that never shut down like Antonica, Commonlands, etc, currently have two copies running, one for each server. After the merge, they will only need one copy running. The theory is that this will allow the extra servers to be added to the cluster of servers available dynamically wherever they’re needed. Rothgar seems to think it’s a good idea and will improve things and I tend to trust what he says. Guess we’ll see once the merges happen. I’m sure there will be some bumps in the road but hopefully we’ll all end up in a better situation when it’s all done.

  9. Hello my names Malawk I’ve been to almost every server in the worlds of EQ2 but my original server was Mistmoore and now I’m back on it so I look forward to all the new faces I’ll be seeing when we join Permafrost 🙂 I know that I have a few friends on every server and most of them are on Permafrost so this works out to be very awesome I can’t wait!

  10. Steve I totally agree about spending SC on rename then losing name on merge in spite of any effort you could make to prevent it.

    Refund of station cash into your SC wallet is only correct action, short of them bargaining directly with you for alternative.

Leave a Reply