<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consolidated Stats Persona Window</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/</link>
	<description>The EQ2 Wire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:10:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ticos (serveur Stormms)</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-4893</link>
		<dc:creator>Ticos (serveur Stormms)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-4893</guid>
		<description>I heard that we did not lose any more 5 % of critical chance by level of distance with the opponent and that now it is useless to exceed the 100 % I find this information nowhere. Is it true?

J&#039;ai entendu dire qu&#039;on ne perdait plus 5% de chance critique par niveau d&#039;écart avec l&#039;adversaire et que maintenant il est inutile de dépasser les 100% Je ne trouve cette information nulle part. Est-ce vrai?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that we did not lose any more 5 % of critical chance by level of distance with the opponent and that now it is useless to exceed the 100 % I find this information nowhere. Is it true?</p>
<p>J&#8217;ai entendu dire qu&#8217;on ne perdait plus 5% de chance critique par niveau d&#8217;écart avec l&#8217;adversaire et que maintenant il est inutile de dépasser les 100% Je ne trouve cette information nulle part. Est-ce vrai?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The EQ2 Wire &#187; Stat Caps and Consolidation</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>The EQ2 Wire &#187; Stat Caps and Consolidation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>[...] you read our coverage of Game Update 55 including Consolidated Stats and Primary Stat Changes and have checked out the EQ2Wire Mega-FAQ, you&#8217;re probably fully up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you read our coverage of Game Update 55 including Consolidated Stats and Primary Stat Changes and have checked out the EQ2Wire Mega-FAQ, you&#8217;re probably fully up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feldon</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Feldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>I believe it&#039;s a UI oversight. The intention is for them to all be the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it&#8217;s a UI oversight. The intention is for them to all be the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llenwyn</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Llenwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>The crit bonus just lists Melee, Spell, Heal and Taunt.
Did they forget Ranged crit bonus or were they just to lazy to list it? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crit bonus just lists Melee, Spell, Heal and Taunt.<br />
Did they forget Ranged crit bonus or were they just to lazy to list it? <img src='http://eq2wire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feldon</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Feldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Because STR is now useless for a Scout!

Before Feb 16: Scouts want 1,200 STR, about 500 INT, and who cares what the AGI is.
After Feb 16: Scouts want 1,500 AGI and who cares what the INT and AGI are.


As for items that have lost their WIS, I would guess it was not specifically priest gear. I think hybrid classes and battle clerics will be the hardest hit with the stat changes, because items have been changed to more closely fit the &quot;desired&quot; archetype that that item was designed for. But it really won&#039;t take long for you to find items to bring your WIS back up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because STR is now useless for a Scout!</p>
<p>Before Feb 16: Scouts want 1,200 STR, about 500 INT, and who cares what the AGI is.<br />
After Feb 16: Scouts want 1,500 AGI and who cares what the INT and AGI are.</p>
<p>As for items that have lost their WIS, I would guess it was not specifically priest gear. I think hybrid classes and battle clerics will be the hardest hit with the stat changes, because items have been changed to more closely fit the &#8220;desired&#8221; archetype that that item was designed for. But it really won&#8217;t take long for you to find items to bring your WIS back up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Steinmetz</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Steinmetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>In the arm guards - WHY did 30 STR become 30 AGI ? On the boots, the numbers changed on two stats ? Are we going to see lots of items nerfed ? Gear I specifically bought with high WIS suddenly have mediocer AGI ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the arm guards &#8211; WHY did 30 STR become 30 AGI ? On the boots, the numbers changed on two stats ? Are we going to see lots of items nerfed ? Gear I specifically bought with high WIS suddenly have mediocer AGI ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eschia</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2010/02/04/consolidated-stats-persona-window/comment-page-1/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Eschia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eq2wire.feldoncentral.com/?p=3055#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>So as a druid, with the consolidating of heal crit and spell crit, my total crit will be over 100%? My heal crit without 3rd party buffs right now on live is 70%. I think my spell crit is like 40% but being a raid healer i rarely use damage spells. Will that 40 add to the 70? If so we may never need buffs for this again. Unless they raise the cap on it. My guess is they will even out the equipment to prevent this from occurring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as a druid, with the consolidating of heal crit and spell crit, my total crit will be over 100%? My heal crit without 3rd party buffs right now on live is 70%. I think my spell crit is like 40% but being a raid healer i rarely use damage spells. Will that 40 add to the 70? If so we may never need buffs for this again. Unless they raise the cap on it. My guess is they will even out the equipment to prevent this from occurring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

