Comments on: FFLiveblog: Mechanics 2 http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/ The EQ2 Wire Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:40:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: The EQ2 Wire » Fan Faire 2009 EQ2 News Rollup http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1041 The EQ2 Wire » Fan Faire 2009 EQ2 News Rollup Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:21:22 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-1041 [...] posts I submitted over the weekend. If you still want to read them, they’re [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [...] [...] posts I submitted over the weekend. If you still want to read them, they’re [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [...]

]]> By: Ishidaa http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1003 Ishidaa Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:56:12 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-1003 Cont. Coverage comment: Which means that you have to run back in to get in melee ca range again, wasting time. Unless you use fittest survival (since you can move while casting it) and then hit coverage and stealth shot then hit rear shot while running back in... but that's really the only senario that would work. If I'm running out with using rear shot, run out, cov/stealth ca, and not doing anything while running back in it seems like a waste. Maybe that's just me. Cont. Coverage comment: Which means that you have to run back in to get in melee ca range again, wasting time. Unless you use fittest survival (since you can move while casting it) and then hit coverage and stealth shot then hit rear shot while running back in… but that’s really the only senario that would work. If I’m running out with using rear shot, run out, cov/stealth ca, and not doing anything while running back in it seems like a waste. Maybe that’s just me.

]]> By: Ishidaa http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1002 Ishidaa Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:50:39 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-1002 The issue I had with coverage is that you had to be away from the enemies. In situations where there is a 8 mob pileup on the tank some mobs will be a different range away from you, and so you have to back up a large range to use it. The issue I had with coverage is that you had to be away from the enemies. In situations where there is a 8 mob pileup on the tank some mobs will be a different range away from you, and so you have to back up a large range to use it.

]]> By: Feldon http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-999 Feldon Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:14:30 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-999 Re: ranger coverage (which is a buff cast between a ranged or melée back attack and a stealthed attack) requires being max range from ANY enemy. As a result, half the time you click it, it says you are too close to the enemy. Yet the Ranger mythical bow's damage is dramatically amplified by standing 5m from the mob. Aeralik's reply was that new bows won't have those distance requirements. Note this was off-the-cuff not set in stone. Re: ranger coverage (which is a buff cast between a ranged or melée back attack and a stealthed attack) requires being max range from ANY enemy. As a result, half the time you click it, it says you are too close to the enemy. Yet the Ranger mythical bow’s damage is dramatically amplified by standing 5m from the mob. Aeralik’s reply was that new bows won’t have those distance requirements. Note this was off-the-cuff not set in stone.

]]> By: Feldon http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-997 Feldon Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:44:22 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-997 The unique attributes and effects of your mythical will work at full potency at 90. Almost like a series of buffs (mythical slot? Or works in inventory as a clicky?). But the green and blue stats will be subject to scaling so as a weapon, mythical would be a poor choice at 90 as those stats are scaled -33%. The unique attributes and effects of your mythical will work at full potency at 90. Almost like a series of buffs (mythical slot? Or works in inventory as a clicky?). But the green and blue stats will be subject to scaling so as a weapon, mythical would be a poor choice at 90 as those stats are scaled -33%.

]]> By: Ishidaa http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-992 Ishidaa Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:02:20 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-992 Sorry in advance if this is double post. "Rangers — would like to re evaluate stream of arrows" good work Feld (if you asked this q). Any mention of Coverage,Hawk, Sniper cast time, or Trap being reworked? Sorry in advance if this is double post.

“Rangers — would like to re evaluate stream of arrows” good work Feld (if you asked this q). Any mention of Coverage,Hawk, Sniper cast time, or Trap being reworked?

]]> By: Anonymous http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-987 Anonymous Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:47:58 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-987 "Plan to keep mythicals relevant in T9 without 1.5" So they will scale with level till 90? (like mentoring would effect an item, and it's full power would be useable when you hit 90?) Seems odd that they would make you still kill t8 content for your epic. Like for SK (and others) epic, killing mayong (who will be gray) is still going to be required? “Plan to keep mythicals relevant in T9 without 1.5″ So they will scale with level till 90? (like mentoring would effect an item, and it’s full power would be useable when you hit 90?) Seems odd that they would make you still kill t8 content for your epic. Like for SK (and others) epic, killing mayong (who will be gray) is still going to be required?

]]> By: Anonymous http://eq2wire.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/comment-page-1/#comment-986 Anonymous Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:45:21 +0000 http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/2009/06/27/mechanics-2/#comment-986 "Rangers — would like to re evaluate stream of arrows" I don't know if this was thanks to you Feldon for being a fellow ranger, but thanks whoever asked about that. Any mention of "coverage", "attack hawk" or "trap"? :) “Rangers — would like to re evaluate stream of arrows”
I don’t know if this was thanks to you Feldon for being a fellow ranger, but thanks whoever asked about that. Any mention of “coverage”, “attack hawk” or “trap”? :)

]]>