<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spell Naming IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eq2wire.com/2009/04/29/spell-naming-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eq2wire.com/2009/04/29/spell-naming-iv/</link>
	<description>The EQ2 Wire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diknak</title>
		<link>http://eq2wire.com/2009/04/29/spell-naming-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Diknak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanfaire08.feldoncentral.com/?p=891#comment-945</guid>
		<description>If they created autoscalling spells, you would cut 75% of progression efforts needed when the level cap is raised.  In RoK, before people didn&#039;t run instances for void shards, they ran them for masters.  Remove that progression and people will stop running instances after 2 months of release.  People that want autoscaling for spells simply can&#039;t see the bigger picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they created autoscalling spells, you would cut 75% of progression efforts needed when the level cap is raised.  In RoK, before people didn&#8217;t run instances for void shards, they ran them for masters.  Remove that progression and people will stop running instances after 2 months of release.  People that want autoscaling for spells simply can&#8217;t see the bigger picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

